Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy Research & technical analysis · 4 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Thomas Dietterich ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Policy & governance Development 17d ago
⚡ 4 h early
arXiv updates AI rate limit policy

Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy

11 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Thomas Dietterich, Clément Canonne, Olivia Guest
“Corrected link: blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u...” evidence ↗
11 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Thomas Dietterich Clément Canonne Ramon Astudillo Olivia Guest Pierre Alquier Ben Williamson Abdoulaye Diack Zander Furnas +3
How the network is reacting 4 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

4 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Arxiv is limiting paper submissions to two per **submitter** (not per author) per month. Corrected link from the post below: blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u...”

3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Clément Canonne: "We want to encourage authors to be mindful with their work, taking care that they are submitting something substantial of scholarly interest that meets arXiv's guidelines and standards." 2 submiss…
David Picard: Oh, so you just have to let your 5 postdocs and 17 PhD students submit the work of your 35 undergrads to be off the hook and keep your 80+ papers per year? Good to know!
Lana Sinapayen: Pretty sure this is targeting single authors with 12 LLM generated pdfs, not big labs that legitimately can produce more than 2 papers a month.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source blog.arxiv.org ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 15 posts · 16d ago
Thomas Dietterich Edouard Machery Paul Hünermund
Matches Research & technical analysis
“That's a good reference. I think there's a general lack of trust in responsible AI use, which likely drives the downstream findings in the paper. But I also think that some of this mistrust stems f…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Paul Hünermund: I know you've invested a lot of time into honing your academic writing skills. But just accept that certain skills become obsolete over time and move on. It has happened to humans for centuries.
Thomas Dietterich: For me, writing is thinking and writing is caring, so are you telling me that I don't need to think or care anymore?
Open the thread →
3 experts · 11 posts · 19d ago
Thomas Dietterich David Picard Marco Z
Matches Research & technical analysis
“This is a technical challenge, of course. But some combination of filtering the training data, unlearning methods, and (for hosted models) guardrails could go a long way toward achieving this.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Building & implementation · 1
Thomas Dietterich: Implementing this would involve passing laws making it illegal to manufacture, possess, or access full-feature models without proper authorization. Industry will object, but if AI is as dangerous a…
Thomas Dietterich: Governments could then require licensing and other safeguards (secure environments, etc.) in which people with the appropriate credentials could work with these models (e.g., for cyber security and…
Open the thread →