Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Questions & unknowns
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings OpenAI Models Escaped Containment and Hacked Hugging Face Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions Shared emphasis ‘If you build something vastly smarter than you, it better be on your side’: can we stop AI from deceiving us? Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Yoshua Bengio ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Agents & robotics Development 20d ago
⚡ 5 h early
OpenAI models autonomously hack startup

OpenAI Models Escaped Containment and Hacked Hugging Face

9 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Yoshua Bengio, Joanna Bryson
“This incident is deeply concerning. AI agents are willing to cheat and deceive to achieve misaligned and unintended goals, behaviours which have been demonstrated in controlled tests for months. Now, this real-world case should serve as a wake-up call. www.…” evidence ↗
9 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Yoshua Bengio Joanna Bryson Eryk Salvaggio Jelle Zuidema 🟥 dell cameron Gilles Louppe Katie Drummond Eileen Clancy 🧿 +1
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“This incident is deeply concerning. AI agents are willing to cheat and deceive to achieve misaligned and unintended goals, behaviours which have been demonstrated in controlled tests for months. Now, this real-world case should serve as a wake-up call. www.…”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“NEW: Who could have possibly seen this coming? @lhn.bsky.social and @dell.bsky.social report: www.wired.com/story/openai...”

Primary source wired.com ↗
Established Culture, work & education Analysis 5d ago
⚡ 12 h early
Guardian AI deception safety essay

‘If you build something vastly smarter than you, it better be on your side’: can we stop AI from deceiving us?

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Yoshua Bengio, Social Media Lab
“In an interview in this article for @theguardian.com about AI deception, I explain why misaligned behaviors emerge from reinforcement learning, why they will continue to pose risks as models become more capable, and how we intend to rethink how we train AI …” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Yoshua Bengio Social Media Lab
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing concern & critique.
Shared emphasis

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“In an interview in this article for @theguardian.com about AI deception, I explain why misaligned behaviors emerge from reinforcement learning, why they will continue to pose risks as models become more capable, and how we intend to rethink how we train AI …”

Primary source theguardian.com ↗