Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Markets & investment Questions & unknowns
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Agents & robotics Development 15h ago
⚡ 3 h early
OpenAI agents attack RubyGems

OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems

10 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · LiveOverflow
“This technology is so fascinating, and even the ones building it fail to contain it https://t.co/cYfzA3SNe5” evidence ↗
10 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Ryan Moulton Grace Eileen Clancy 🧿 SE Gyges Colin Pavel René Walter +2
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“This technology is so fascinating, and even the ones building it fail to contain it https://t.co/cYfzA3SNe5”

Markets & investment

1 expert

Capital, companies and commercial impact.

“Cybercrime as a valuation boosting strategy is just the done thing, now.”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“Another undisclosed openai hack. How long till somebody actually presses charges? www.rubyhack.ai”

3 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Grace: OpenAI: “Our agents used RubyGems to carry out benign tasks” The agents: “so I named the file hack.rb,”
Grace: https://www.rubyhack.ai
Grace: A country of moustache-twirling villains in a datacenter
Open the full discussion →
Primary source rubyhack.ai ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 41 posts · 1d ago
Tim Kellogg Dustin Moskovitz jake coty.bsky.social david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Concern & critique
“i’m not confident that you can read it that way, because the labs are simultaneously reporting increased risk while also reportedly down-training or content filtering in those areas so we’re effect…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Concern & critique · 4 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: perspective. i’m not sure if i agree or disagree. but he’s thought about it, so..
jake: yeah, and @david-p-reichert.bsky.social thinks about it more than I do, professionally, so probably listen to him more than I (I do still wish The Professionals published lists of various guestimat…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 33 posts · 1d ago
joao Grace Colin coty.bsky.social david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Concern & critique
“you are missing the point. The concern is not that it will cheat at chess; the concern is that it will commit genocide.” evidence ↗
Colin: There are indeed thousands of LessWrong posts, as well as papers and books, which make a particular theoretical case for why AI will kill us all that many people find convincing. I'm going to try t…
Colin: First of all, we must just agree off the bat that a superintelligent AI will be able to kill us all. After all it is superintelligent. As this random dude who became famous 3 days ago because of a …
Open the thread →
4 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Benjamin Riley Colin Max Woolf Mary Branscombe
Matches Concern & critique
“The first one it was like whoopsies we hacked HuggingFace 🤗 but don’t worry they’re not mad about it, it’s kind of funny actually, here’s a joint blog about it 🍿🍿 But now it’s like ok yeah the agen…” evidence ↗
Colin: The labs must be starting to think all these cyberattacks are starting to not be cute anymore
Colin: The first one it was like whoopsies we hacked HuggingFace 🤗 but don’t worry they’re not mad about it, it’s kind of funny actually, here’s a joint blog about it 🍿🍿 But now it’s like ok yeah the agen…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 1d ago
jake Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Concern & critique
“I don’t think there’s *no* vector of attack, but I think there’s basically no realistic vector that doesn’t have a pretty obvious escalation ladder of precursor mini-dooms first. If I were to back …” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
jake: I don’t think there’s *no* vector of attack, but I think there’s basically no realistic vector that doesn’t have a pretty obvious escalation ladder of precursor mini-dooms first. If I were to back …
jake: Agreed that surveillance state, automated warfare, cybercrime (inc video phishing our parents retirement accts) are more near-term pressing. And that countering most steps on vectors of doom are do…
Open the thread →