Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Context & explanation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Development 2h ago
⚡ 48 h early
non-English AI models higher cost finding

AI models cost more when you don’t use English

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Context & explanation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis
“This is the kind of reporting and needed perspective and context we will lose when/if @restofworld.org shuts down: AI models cost more when you don’t use English restofworld.org/2026/ai-toke...” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“This is the kind of reporting and needed perspective and context we will lose when/if @restofworld.org shuts down: AI models cost more when you don’t use English restofworld.org/2026/ai-toke...”

New AI field signal Signal 6h ago
⚡ 4 h early

Big Tech claims voters’ AI backlash is “anti-Trump” not “anti-tech”

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Context & explanation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Karl Bode
“tech titans will spend the next two years pretending they didn't ENTHUSIASTICALLY support the most corrupt and fascist administration in U.S. history” evidence ↗
3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 13 posts · 18h ago
Matches Context & explanation
“I'm not sure what happened; GenAI is part of it, but not all of it. The trend began earlier.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Ted Underwood: We need a social movement to explain to students and entrepreneurs — that it's a bad idea to email random professors in other states for advice. It was charming to get one inquiry a month, but thre…
Ted Underwood: I'm not sure what happened; GenAI is part of it, but not all of it. The trend began earlier.
Open the thread →
5 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
Matches Context & explanation
“Also applies to people who don’t speak. See: history of “deaf and dumb” concept.” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Context & explanation · 2
Naomi Saphra: Thinking LMs are sentient is the flip side of thinking nonhuman animals aren't sentient. We're so attuned to language as a signal for sentience that we can't conceive of unpairing sentience from li…
Luke Stark: Thinking LMs are sentient is the flip side of thinking nonhuman animals aren't sentient. We're so attuned to language as a signal for sentience that we can't conceive of unpairing sentience from li…
Open the thread →