Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Markets & investment reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Markets & investment
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 6 posts · 14h ago
Ethan Zuckerman evacide
Matches Markets & investment
“Bruce Schneier @schneier.com wants to draw a distinction between AI's capitalism problems and tech problems, in hopes of making an argument for democracy-supporting AIs. He's aware that most of us …” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Policy & governance · 2
Ethan Zuckerman: "In the US, legislation is written by lobbyists - maybe AI written legislation would be better" #attention2026. (Vass Bednar @canadianshieldinstitute.ca is skeptical...)
Ethan Zuckerman: Bruce Schneier @schneier.com wants to draw a distinction between AI's capitalism problems and tech problems, in hopes of making an argument for democracy-supporting AIs. He's aware that most of us …
Open the thread →