Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Opportunity & adoption reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Opportunity & adoption
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Policy & governance Signal 1h ago

Another Commission for Global AI Governance. How Can It Deliver for Africa?

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tech Policy Press
“Jane Munga of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace examines the ITU's new AI for Good Global Commission and identifies five issues it must address to deliver real benefits for Africa.” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Tech Policy Press

“Jane Munga of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace examines the ITU's new AI for Good Global Commission and identifies five issues it must address to deliver real benefits for Africa.”

Primary source techpolicy.press ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 42 posts · 14h ago
Pwnallthethings Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Phillip Carter Doll
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“I literally worked on Google Books scanops SRE, ama the same guy who ran Google Books now has the equivalent job at Anthropic and I can promise you that all of us handled every library book with th…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): literally these are books that would be pulped if not bought for 10 cents on the dollar. do rare books sometimes make it into there? yeah, if someone is careless, but that's *upstream* of what happ…
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): I literally worked on Google Books scanops SRE, ama the same guy who ran Google Books now has the equivalent job at Anthropic and I can promise you that all of us handled every library book with th…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 25 posts · 1d ago
Pwnallthethings SE Gyges david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“I think there is a bizarre atmosphere at the labs where there is genuine concern that the field is simultaneously under urgent pressure to go faster, and a visceral sense that it is going too fast.…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
SE Gyges: here's who signed both the Pacing the Frontier letter released today and the Pause AI letter in 2023 demanding an end to all research for six months also, raw counts for "signed today's letter" and…
SE Gyges: fundamentally this is an anthropic thing that managed to recruit some people from other companies
Open the thread →
3 experts · 11 posts · 1d ago
tweety fish Arseny Khakhalin austin
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“presumably! the suit against the internet archive held that keeping the physical copy of a digitized thing was infringing; bartz held that if you transform a physical work by scanning it and then r…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
tweety fish: Ngl i keep seeing this blamed on AI companies but this is just copyright law regarding scanning in action
austin: presumably! the suit against the internet archive held that keeping the physical copy of a digitized thing was infringing; bartz held that if you transform a physical work by scanning it and then r…
Open the thread →