Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Policy & governance reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“I’m curious about this. A lot of people voted against data centres in their local areas, which could spell trouble for hyperscalers. Plus there may be a fear of greater regulation/scrutiny of IPOs.…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Andrew D Wilson: Is the timing wrt the midterms causal here?
Dr Keith Wilson 🏳️‍🌈: I’m curious about this. A lot of people voted against data centres in their local areas, which could spell trouble for hyperscalers. Plus there may be a fear of greater regulation/scrutiny of IPOs.…
Open the thread →