Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Responsible AI Signal 4h ago

AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountability

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Deb Raji
“Fwiw academia has always played a critical role in third party accountability & AI auditing - challenges abound but the commitment to publication and peer review also incentivizes some degree of rigor & public engagement (we write a bit about that h…” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Deb Raji

“Fwiw academia has always played a critical role in third party accountability & AI auditing - challenges abound but the commitment to publication and peer review also incentivizes some degree of rigor & public engagement (we write a bit about that h…”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
New Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 7h ago

Can LLMs Follow Medical Expert Logic? A Benchmark for Hierarchical Logical Consistency in Risk-of-Bias Assessment

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Artificial Intelligence Papers
“Can LLMs Follow Medical Expert Logic? A Benchmark for Hierarchical Logical Consistency in Risk-of-Bias Assessment Jiayu Huang, Zichen Tang, Qianhui Ling, Zemin Kuang, Haihong E https://t.co/pWSPJvr8SF [𝚌𝚜.𝙰𝙸] 💬Accepted to EMNLP 2026 Main Conference https://…” evidence ↗
1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered
Artificial Intelligence Papers

“Can LLMs Follow Medical Expert Logic? A Benchmark for Hierarchical Logical Consistency in Risk-of-Bias Assessment Jiayu Huang, Zichen Tang, Qianhui Ling, Zemin Kuang, Haihong E https://t.co/pWSPJvr8SF [𝚌𝚜.𝙰𝙸] 💬Accepted to EMNLP 2026 Main Conference https://…”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 33 posts · 1d ago
joao Grace Colin coty.bsky.social david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Research & technical analysis
“There are indeed thousands of LessWrong posts, as well as papers and books, which make a particular theoretical case for why AI will kill us all that many people find convincing. I'm going to try t…” evidence ↗
Colin: There are indeed thousands of LessWrong posts, as well as papers and books, which make a particular theoretical case for why AI will kill us all that many people find convincing. I'm going to try t…
Colin: First of all, we must just agree off the bat that a superintelligent AI will be able to kill us all. After all it is superintelligent. As this random dude who became famous 3 days ago because of a …
Open the thread →