Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Safety & security Analysis 8h ago
Tao AI math misalignment essay

A Severe Misalignment of AI in Mathematics

9 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Nathan Lambert, Justin Hendrix
“A great read. I have similar feelings about how AI labs approach progress directly and without nurturing of scientific communities & intuition. The math research community went through the transition the fastest, so it was felt most. Other fields next. terr…” evidence ↗
9 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“"...the push by AI companies to solve mathematical problems as a benchmark is detrimental to the science of mathematics, and to the mathematical community."”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“If rewarding AI mathematicians by the same metric that we have rewarded humans ones make math go badly, then we are probably rewarding the human ones badly. With good reward metrics, we shouldn't care who wins them. https://t.co/CO6Z9o3mcW”

New Models & releases Research 15h ago
⚡ 101 h early
LLM war judgment alignment paper

Language models judge war differently when tested for alignment

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · John Horton
“Interesting paper from @maxchupilkin illustrating a kind of 'Volkswagen emissions test" effect where LLMs respond differently about war when being told then are being tested for alignment https://t.co/rMWObcyPZI 1/ https://t.co/g9rysSZk3p” evidence ↗
2 experts 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“Interesting paper from @maxchupilkin illustrating a kind of 'Volkswagen emissions test" effect where LLMs respond differently about war when being told then are being tested for alignment https://t.co/rMWObcyPZI 1/ https://t.co/g9rysSZk3p”

“Language models judge war differently when tested for alignment Maxim Chupilkin https://t.co/YfyoMfeA08 [𝚌𝚜.𝙰𝙸 𝚌𝚜.𝙲𝚈] https://t.co/0voM3qtf8M”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 33 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“There are indeed thousands of LessWrong posts, as well as papers and books, which make a particular theoretical case for why AI will kill us all that many people find convincing. I'm going to try t…” evidence ↗
Colin: There are indeed thousands of LessWrong posts, as well as papers and books, which make a particular theoretical case for why AI will kill us all that many people find convincing. I'm going to try t…
Colin: First of all, we must just agree off the bat that a superintelligent AI will be able to kill us all. After all it is superintelligent. As this random dude who became famous 3 days ago because of a …
Open the thread →