Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,378 searchable experts 3,805 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Policy & governance Development 4h ago
⚡ 5 h early
Germany AI migration draft law bias

Germany's Draft Law on AI in Migration Raises Rights and Bias Concerns

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 1 community 2 sources clustered

“Germany's cabinet approved a bill in July that would allow AI use in visa, residence and asylum procedures. Natalie Welfens, Josefine Flesch and Bernard Quante unpack the rights and bias concerns it raises. buff.ly/SZWJ2GO”

New Responsible AI Analysis 17h ago
Joanna Bryson AI ethics interview

Yapay Zekayı Suçlayamazsınız! | Prof. Joanna Bryson ile AI Etiği ve Geleceğimiz

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“This was a pretty good interview about generative AI and liabilities, but if you don't speak Turkish you might want to skip forward to around minute 5:30 where I start talking www.youtube.com/watch?v=lC1G...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 28 posts · 23h ago
tweety fish: lol I mean come the fuck on man. Of course it fucking is. If you hate AI enough to avoid any software coded using it—fine! supportable! go with god!—then at least use a fucking modicum of critical …
tweety fish: “Wow this would probably take like a hundred+ hours of work if you weren’t using AI and is super polished and elaborate and was made and released on a lark, not going to think about that any furthe…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 14 posts · 1d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: there’s a higher-than-you’d-think possibility that this is actually a leak and not a prediction (pretty sure Andrew only bets when the dice are biased in his favor)
Tim Kellogg: uh, i don’t think it’s as open as you’re thinking. pretty sure the IPO will happen before christmas, maybe within a month
Open the thread →
2 experts · 13 posts · 1d ago
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: This “game” on the White House website, a version of Snake where you play as a white man in a suit and you run around picking up identifiably black, Asian, and Latino men and putting them in orange…
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: Yes, clearly, but what were the instructions they gave, who told them to give instructions, etc, on up. What is the chain that led to this thing coming into existence?
Open the thread →