Self-assessments with a sample size of 1 are insufficient for understanding what the thing is doing to your brain.
Pavel
Tracked through public AI activity and peer connections inside the directory.
- AI signals
- 24 past 30d
- Sources
- 19 distinct domains
- Discusiones
- 96 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 4h ago
Articles & links
Not liking AI is now a terrorist act
- Wired reviewed over 1,000 pages of unpublished DHS, FBI, and fusion-center reports coalescing around a new label called 'anti-tech extremism.'
- A Delaware Valley fusion-center bulletin flagged AI data centers as extremist targets while conceding it had no specific plots or suspects.
- The term 'anti-technology violent extremism' does not appear in any publicly available DHS or FBI extremism documents, per Wired's review.
It's just science
Makes me think of this (and the conscientious objector option)
After six months of Claude Code, Microsoft has had enough
This, for example. In the service of showing how awesome and cutting edge they are, KPMG released a work of fiction masquerading as a report. All the case studies were made up. They have finally withdrawn it. But it's only a matter of time until they find another agentic rake …
Recent commentary
Some years ago, I wrote "friction is texture." But as AI-extruded homogenized slop takes over social media and blogs, I am coming to realize that friction is also *flavor*. When content is optimized for consumption, the words feel like someone has already chewed and digested them on my behalf.
Two businessmen meet. One says, I've got a truckload of vodka. The other says, I'll give you 300 dollars for it. They shake on the deal. Then they part ways — the first to try and find a truckload of vodka, the second to try and find $300. This is a joke about AI.
My favorite genre of thinkpiece is "the way you use AI is roasting your brain right inside your tiny baby head; however the way I use AI actually makes me brilliant and powerful, kind of like a god or maybe even stronger than the gods"
Two people are walking down the street when they see a billboard that says "The AI singularity is on the horizon!" One turns to the other and asks, what's a horizon? The other one answers: it's an imaginary line that moves away as quickly as you can approach it.
"Oh, I only use LLMs for research. I just use AI for ideas. ChatGPT wrote the first draft, nothing else." So what you're telling me is that it's doing all your thinking for you.
There are two kinds of articles I refuse to link to in my newsletter: - substack links - AI-generated pieces Every week, to my disappointment, I have to turn away several legitimately interesting articles that violate either of these clauses (or, more often than not, both). It's 2026. Do better.
Born to: write about cool things people like Forced to; write about AI
Remarkable that "PhD level" super genius LLMs can't detect the sentiment my newsletter might have towards AI
Some AI bullshit has profiled me, in case you wanted to know how to earn a Credibility Halo with me
lots of talk about "aligning AI" which I don't really get - the only alignment AI can have is Chaotic Evil
In Pavel's orbit
Center = Pavel. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.