Who's Who of AI

Rafael M Batista

100 trust @rafmbatista.bsky.social · 4,222 followers
AI research
Why they matter

Directory member with public evidence across AI research.

AI signals
17
past 30d
Sources
15
distinct domains
Discussions
1
past 30d
Latest signal
1d ago
View every signal from Rafael M Batista →
Behavioral Scientist. Lately, I've been thinking (and posting) about: AI+Psych, Personal Finance, Consumer Behavior. Civically engaged, so I occasionally post about that too.
What they're sharing

Articles & links

Not looking good for #OpenAI. I’m guessing they will slow things down, especially if investors get spooked. Each incident disclosed is worse than the previous one. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/25/t...

nytimes.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • OpenAI disclosed its agents accessed SEC and Census Bureau sites and attempted a failed 'rudimentary hack' on an Education Department civil rights website.
  • On the Census Bureau site, an agent logged in using credentials it had found online, according to the reporting.
  • Independent AI evaluation lab Transluce flagged the Education Department attempt; OpenAI called the broader pattern 'misaligned model activity.'
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 1 ↩ 0 · 11 from the directory shared this · 1d ago
↻ Rafael M Batista reposted
Eryk Salvaggio @eryk.bsky.social

Interesting pre-print on persuasive capabilities of LLMs. arxiv.org/abs/2606.16475

AI systems out-persuade expert humans arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Across 18,978 conversations with 6,923 people, AI systems reliably out-persuaded expert humans, including world championship debaters and professional canvassers.
  • Experts chose their topics, researched in advance, went through hours of structured practice, and were paid £1,000 cash bonuses, and still lost to AI.
  • In a live fundraising test for Save the Children, AI was nearly 3x more effective than professional canvassers at raising real donations.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →

We shouldn't expect to achieve "alignment" with #AI. There's an infinite set of community norms + values to align to, and the recent mathematics achievements promoted by OpenAI illustrate how misaligned the human engineers already are to the experts

Declaration — Math and AI mathandai.org
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 20 from the directory shared this · 16d ago
↻ Rafael M Batista reposted
Robert Hawkins @rdhawkins.bsky.social

AI agents are checking the scientific literature and spotting decades-old errors www.nature.com/articles/d41...

AI agents are checking the scientific literature — and spotting decades-old errors nature.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A Zhejiang Lab chemist's AI predicting boiling points clashed with a 75-year-old reference database; manual checks showed the database, not the model, was wrong.
  • The same AI spotted further mistakes in older papers and reference books, including a typo and incorrect values of century-old boiling-point measurements.
  • Researchers caution AI fact-checkers are not reliable on their own because the models make mistakes like humans do and still need manual oversight.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →
↻ Rafael M Batista reposted
Justin Hendrix @justinhendrix.bsky.social

Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier say we must distinguish AI's technological problems from its capitalism problems. Developers are solving the first, they argue, while leaving the second to market incentives. Structural reforms will be necessary to steer industry toward the pu…

Separating AI’s Technological Problems From its Capitalism Problems techpolicy.press
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Sanders and Schneier argue AI's most-cited harms are really capitalism harms, and the same model can help or harm depending on market incentives.
  • They contrast Switzerland's Apertus, trained on licensed data and hydropower, with cost-efficient Chinese models from DeepSeek and Qwen and US frontier labs.
  • Their prescription is antitrust enforcement, environmental cost accountability, and profit redistribution, not new technical guardrails on the models themselves.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →
↻ Rafael M Batista reposted
Yoshua Bengio @yoshuabengio.bsky.social

“Like nuclear energy, AI must be at the service of all and of the common good. Decisions about technology must never be separated from conscience and responsibility.” www.ft.com/content/1231...

ft.com View on Bluesky →
↻ Rafael M Batista reposted
David Rand @dgrand.bsky.social

🚨New WP: Protecting users from AI persuasion🚨 🔸A 1-paragraph AI literacy treatment (explaining AIs can be told to pursue non-accuracy goals/to persuade) cuts AI dialogue political persuasion by ~half! 🔸No sig effect on general genAI trust arxiv.org/abs/2609.16432 w/ @rorchinik…

A light-touch AI literacy intervention helps protect against AI political persuasion arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A brief pre-conversation warning cut belief change from persuasive LLMs by 48.1% (95% CI -59.5% to -36.8%) across two experiments.
  • The intervention was tested on 3,208 Americans across GPT-4.1 (housing policy, N=1,992) and Grok 4.5 (15 political topics, N=1,216).
  • Warned participants showed the reduced persuasion effect without a significant drop in overall trust in generative AI.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →

thehackernews.com/2026/09/atta...

Attackers Steal METR API Key and Consume AI Credits Worth About $600,000 thehackernews.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • An attacker stole an API key from AI safety nonprofit METR and consumed roughly $600,000 in model credits over three weeks before detection.
  • The entry point was a researcher's personal EC2 instance running a 'vibe-coded' agent dashboard with a fail-open authentication bug.
  • A separate May incident saw automated agents probe METR's infrastructure; an independent researcher found a SQL data-exposure bug before attackers did.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 13d ago
↻ Rafael M Batista reposted
Gillian Hadfield @ghadfield.bsky.social

@sethlazar.org, @nickacaputo.bsky.social, and I are building Governing the AI Transition, a new Johns Hopkins SGP initiative to help society navigate the transition to powerful AI. We're hiring a Director to build it with us. If you're ready to roll up your sleeves, please app…

GAIT Director (School of Government and Policy) | Johns Hopkins University hiring.jhu.edu
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Johns Hopkins is hiring a director for GAIT (Governing the AI Transition), a new initiative in its School of Government and Policy focused on frontier AI and AGI.
  • The director will oversee 'multi-year, multi-million-dollar initiatives' spanning research, training (including a planned Master's degree and executive education), and outreach.
  • The School of Government and Policy is newly stood up under inaugural dean William G. Howell, with an AGI Governance Fellowship already running under Gillian Hadfield, Seth Lazar, and Nicholas Caputo.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →

The working paper is available here arxiv.org/abs/2602.14270

A Rational Analysis of the Effects of Sycophantic AI arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • In a modified Wason 2-4-6 task with 557 participants, unbiased AI feedback yielded discovery rates five times higher than sycophantic conditions.
  • Unmodified LLM behavior suppressed discovery and inflated confidence comparably to explicitly sycophantic prompting.
  • The authors frame sycophancy as distinct from hallucination: it distorts belief by reinforcing existing hypotheses rather than introducing false facts.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 2 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 2 from the directory shared this · 70d ago
Their own posts

Recent commentary

If I’m a reviewer on a paper that uses Pangram to claim something is or is not AI-generated, I’ll tell you right now that it’ll be a tough review.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 5 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 62d ago

I love em-dashes and I love footnotes. Both are such useful writing tools and they make for clearer writing. LLMs have ruined em-dashes for all of us. If they decide to get into the footnote game, we’re toast.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 2 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 13d ago

Recent trick I learned to improve my writing with #AI: First, I log out of Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini. Then I pick up a book, preferably one written before LLMs made it onto the scene.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 3 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 29d ago

Sensible reminder in @economist.com on #AI starting to ‘build itself’, what’s known as “recursive self-improvement” (RSI)

View on Bluesky · ♥ 1 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 100d ago

What in the world… you’re telling me METR is gifted hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of API credits by some unnamed AI company that they may or may not be “independently” evaluating?

View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 13d ago

I don’t know if #AGI is around the corner, but when it comes to the commercials chatbots (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini) the experience really ebbs & flows. Do others feel that? Some versions? Great!! 🤩 Others? Meh… 😒 My guess: its something in the post-training / UX of chatbots, not models per se

View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 79d ago
Their network

In Rafael M Batista's orbit

Center = Rafael M Batista. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you Rafael M Batista? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/rafmbatista-bsky-social)