Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Alex Gude ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Analysis 5d ago
Ed Zitron AI skeptic predictions review

How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been?

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“I've had this sense in the back of my head but never bothered enough to investigate. @danluu.com took the trouble to actually compile receipts. This is the new media: the best way to establish a brand is to tell people what they want to hear, over and over.…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 9 posts · 6d ago
Shared emphasis Building & implementation · 2
Ryan Moulton: We are not going to de novo invent a whole new language to describe agents rather than reusing the one language for agents we have. Imagine a star next to all the words if you want. Agents don't ha…
Ryan Moulton: Love is a bit unusual in that respect in that the difference between "outwardly displays all the behaviors of love" and "inwardly feels it" matters a lot to people. That distinction doesn't matter …
Open the thread →