Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by apenwarr.ca ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 20 posts · 4d ago
apenwarr.ca: Alarmed at this trend of people finally realizing MCP is a pointless abstraction, then skipping right over publishing a regular boring API, and instead launching new CLIs for agents to use for some…
apenwarr.ca: I mean, it’s not *really* baffling. It’s Conway’s Law and the people who own the API wouldn’t listen to you and you weren’t allowed to publish a second API after people saw through the MCP trick, b…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 6 posts · 5d ago
Ethan Mollick: I am confused about the belief that if open weights eventually dominate it will lead to the collapse of AI. If the Labs lose (which is not happening now), it isn’t because AI was useless: compute i…
apenwarr.ca: Could lead to a dotcom-level crash, which was giant but notably didn’t kill the whole Internet. Hardware providers, they suffered tremendously after the dotcom crash (see Nortel) because their buye…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 15d ago
antirez.bsky.social: About LLMs export control. A few interesting things that people right now may not yet focus since they are "far" problems. 1. It is impossible to really take LLMs safe. They are a a few TB files wo…
antirez.bsky.social: 2. It is possible to proxy models accounts from one country to the other as long as internet exists. Creating a ban would create a huge problem of illegal sharing of LLMs access. It is impossible t…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 12d ago
apenwarr.ca: Finally tried fable yesterday (yes, I am still a late adopter). Like all LLMs, it still tells me as a genius. The difference is it makes it more convincing.
apenwarr.ca: In related news, if you open up its thinking trace: Fable talks like a normal person. It only breaks out the claudisms and glazing in its “official” response post thinking. It’s putting on a show.
Open the thread →