Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by apenwarr.ca ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

9 experts · 55 posts · 6h ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 2 Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): I mean, people are also being fucking insufferable about it which certainly is not tamping down the amount of worry
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): telling people they are going to all lose their jobs is not a great way to start off on the right foot
Open the thread →
3 experts · 26 posts · 5d ago
apenwarr.ca: Come on, what does it take to get cancelled on this website? I’ve been vibe coding like crazy and sponsoring open source projects and responding to GitHub issues and just, nothing
apenwarr.ca: The closest I’ve come is blog posts that annoy IPv6 defenders. And if we’re honest there just aren’t enough of those for a proper mob
Open the thread →