Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Opportunity & adoption Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Unit distance remarks Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Ben Recht ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 2560 h early

Unit distance remarks

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · James Grimmelmann
“The companion paper contains a version of the (dis)proof in the level of detail expected by the mathematical community, and some of the mathematicians whose comments are included there have the expertise to vouch for its correctness. cdn.openai.com/pdf/74c2…” evidence ↗
5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Ben Recht Suresh Venkatasubramanian Grace James Grimmelmann Benjamin Riley
8 experts discussed this · 47 posts
Colin: I hate that today’s most prominent AI skeptics keep forcing me to argue against them. I yearn to join them in the fight against the booster zealots, wherein there is still plenty of room for legiti…
Colin: The questions available to a skeptic today are kind of esoteric, like “how much should we as a society be willing to pay for theorems”
Ben Recht: The way forward is through the mushy middle. This technology is amazing. It works and breaks in surprising ways. The main boosters are lunatics. And the loudest critics are detached from reality. F…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source cdn.openai.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 47 posts · 4d ago
Ben Recht Luis Villa VE, cybersocial occult investigator Anthony Moser tweety fish Pavel
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I've been thinking for a minute that the bounds of what kinds of software you can make haven't really changed with LLMs because LLMs haven't invented a new computing architecture or interface parad…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Building & implementation · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
tweety fish: like people are getting mad about this but serioulsly, an ethical stand against software developed with AI tools, right now, today, rules out essentially ALL SOFTWARE. I'm sorry! macos. bluesky. th…
tweety fish: anyhow I promise that you have never ever once used a piece of software developed by ME using AI tools, that I can say with 100% confidence.
Open the thread →
4 experts · 29 posts · 2d ago
Ben Recht tweety fish Isaiah Bishop B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them)
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Yes and i think we need to be more careful than looking at a benchmark.” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Research & technical analysis · 3
Isaiah Bishop: I dont see a reason to think AGI is impossible, but i do think a lot of people are getting over their skis in part because the anti-AI backlash was pretty dumb
Isaiah Bishop: Like my fundamental view is that AI as it exists, is just the kind of embedded capital we have for machines but for knowledge work. Nothing i have seen from them suggests a really extensive interna…
Open the thread →