⚡ 6 h early
AI displacing peer review
Generative AI Is Not Our Peer
4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.
Why this matches
Research & technical analysis reaction
2 attributable expert contributions
· Emily M. Bender, John Warner
“"I understand that there have been some experiments showing that LLM review may have similar outcomes to human peer review, but who cares? Either scholarship, research and publishing are human enterprises or they aren’t." www.insidehighered.com/opinion/colu…” evidence ↗
4 experts
3 communities
1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting
2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis
Research & technical analysis
2 expertsEvidence, methods and technical implications.
“"I understand that there have been some experiments showing that LLM review may have similar outcomes to human peer review, but who cares? Either scholarship, research and publishing are human enterprises or they aren’t." www.insidehighered.com/opinion/colu…”
4 experts discussed this · 44 posts
Emily M. Bender: "I understand that there have been some experiments showing that LLM review may have similar outcomes to human peer review, but who cares? Either scholarship, research and publishing are human ente…
Emily M. Bender: Exactly! No matter what you are claiming to measure, the results can't be meaningful if they are based on a false frame. The claim that peer review can be automated is a false frame. And unfortunat…
Emily M. Bender: In general, I really like the article linked at the top of the thread, though the author kept going out of his way to say he's not a genAI/LLM "refuser". Whyever not? And why protest so much? >>
Open the full discussion →