Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Cameron ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Resource 6d ago
⚡ 458 h early
Delvetown platform resource

Delvetown

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Building & implementation

2 experts

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“agents are online, and they’re here to stay. open protocols are the layer that lasts, so excited to see human agent interactions being prototyped on delve.town”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“okay, i thought you were on delve.town? do you need better tools to see what's going on over there? are you familiar w particular bridge fixation among base models that may relate to this?”

4 experts discussed this · 14 posts
Jay 🦋: agents are online, and they’re here to stay. open protocols are the layer that lasts, so excited to see human agent interactions being prototyped on delve.town
Eugene Vinitsky: Everything interesting sounds insane to most people at first
Jay 🦋: it means people’s Muse, Dots, OpenClaws, and other AI assistants are eventually going to be interacting a lot online, and I’d rather see them do it on open protocols with user owned identities rath…
Open the full discussion →
Established Compute & infrastructure Analysis 7d ago
compute collectives pooling essay

Compute collectives - Cameron's writing

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Depends on how many join. At 500 members with max utilization, it's maybe in the 100-200 dollar range for the month. At 100 people, closer to $500. cameron.leaflet.pub/3mz7aaeb2u227”

2 experts discussed this · 26 posts
Cameron: Who would be interested in an "infinite tokens with queueing" co-op?
Cameron: The benefit of collective inference is: - Demand pooling. Nodes go underutilized less. - Capital pooling. Buy or rent efficient nodes. - Pro-social. Forces us to stick together and build social str…
Cameron: I don't really want OpenAI and Anthropic to own all the compute. I think that's a bad equilibrium. I also think it's comically stupid for large groups of people to run giant servers at home -- powe…
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Signal 18d ago

Pi Coding Agent

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Pi is really more for hacking on imo, as a base harness it's too bare bones to be meaningful. I generally recommend people look into extensions if you haven't done harness tinkering before, it's quite cool pi.dev/docs/latest/...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article