New
AI field signal
Analysis
12h ago
⚡ 6 h early
essay how to talk AI
How to talk about
11 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
Why this matches
Building & implementation reaction
1 attributable expert contribution
· Charles Logan
“I’m working with a librarian to develop a module for undergraduates about conducting research, and I’m once again grateful for this resource from @emilymbender.bsky.social and @nannainie.bsky.social:” evidence ↗
11 experts
2 communities
1 sources clustered
Emily M. Bender
Timnit Gebru
Hypervisible
Luke Stark
Eileen Clancy 🧿
Frank Pasquale
Charles Logan
Jeffrey Vagle
+3
“I’m working with a librarian to develop a module for undergraduates about conducting research, and I’m once again grateful for this resource from @emilymbender.bsky.social and @nannainie.bsky.social:”
“A good rule of thumb: If the press release (or stenographic news reporting masquerading as journalism) says that an "AI" did something, that's deliberate obfuscation. Software doesn't do anything of its own accord, but folks sure like to talk about it as if…”
2 experts discussed this · 16 posts
Emily M. Bender: So many conversations where otherwise serious people throw around the term "AI" without defining it, despite it being notoriously ill-defined. Thinking about why this might be >>
Emily M. Bender: In some cases, no doubt, the speaker fully believes that autonomous thinking machines are among us. (Though I said "otherwise serious people" in the prev post, so.) >>
Emily M. Bender: In other cases, I suspect that people feel like they lack the expertise to call bullshit and are repeating what they hear others say. >>
Open the full discussion →