Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Christian Wolf ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Analysis 13h ago
research self-confessed fabrications rise

Self-confessed Fabrications and Rise of TBDs

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Gautam Kamath, Christian Wolf
“How do you tell if authors fabricated their research results? Sometimes: they just tell you. Read, e.g., this caption carefully. Another banger of a post by my friend Nihar B. Shah on his blog, where he found at least 20+ such #ICLR2027 submissions: researc…” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“How do you tell if authors fabricated their research results? Sometimes: they just tell you. Read, e.g., this caption carefully. Another banger of a post by my friend Nihar B. Shah on his blog, where he found at least 20+ such #ICLR2027 submissions: researc…”

3 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Gautam Kamath: How do you tell if authors fabricated their research results? Sometimes: they just tell you. Read, e.g., this caption carefully. Another banger of a post by my friend Nihar B. Shah on his blog, whe…
Naomi Saphra: How do you tell if authors fabricated their research results? Sometimes: they just tell you. Read, e.g., this caption carefully. Another banger of a post by my friend Nihar B. Shah on his blog, whe…
samuel mehr: oopsies
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago
⚡ 9 h early

Dino Forcing Flow Models: Do not denoise what you can predict

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · David Picard
“🚨 New preprint: "Dino Forcing Flow Models: Do not denoise what you can predict" @arrijitghosh.bsky.social @lucasdegeorge.bsky.social P. Couairon, A.A. Efros, @vickykalogeiton.bsky.social and me 📜 arxiv.org/abs/2610.11751 🖥️ arijit-hub.github.io/projects/din…” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“🚨 New preprint: "Dino Forcing Flow Models: Do not denoise what you can predict" @arrijitghosh.bsky.social @lucasdegeorge.bsky.social P. Couairon, A.A. Efros, @vickykalogeiton.bsky.social and me 📜 arxiv.org/abs/2610.11751 🖥️ arijit-hub.github.io/projects/din…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

10 experts · 12 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Helping authors improve their papers is not the purpose of peer review.” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Research & technical analysis · 5 Building & implementation · 1
Ben Recht: Helping authors improve their papers is not the purpose of peer review.
Dan Goodman: Keeping academics in their place (as revenue sources for journals).
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 2d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“LLM Impact on peer review: - TMLR increases the importance of clarity - ICML introduces desk rejections by ACs - RSS introduces 2 phases & "signed reviewers" - Some journals temp. suspend submissio…” evidence ↗
Christian Wolf: LLM Impact on peer review: - TMLR increases the importance of clarity - ICML introduces desk rejections by ACs - RSS introduces 2 phases & "signed reviewers" - Some journals temp. suspend submissio…
Christian Wolf: Some of the symptoms: - 9k papers accepted to NeurIPS 2026 - 60k submissions to ICLR 2027
Open the thread →