Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Vincent Conitzer ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Resource 6d ago
⚡ 215 h early
America.gov US government resource

America.gov

25 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Lightspeed
“What if AI could handle the paperwork you’ve been putting off? “Being able to file a passport online and have it be done through a chatbot just feels like the future,” says @Machiz. That’s part of the longer-term ambition for https://t.co/jzCcQ8Xa7i, which …” evidence ↗
25 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“America.gov does not do pronouns. Any pronouns. (Courtesy of my daughter!) aifails.substack.com/p/pronouns”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Jessica Ji weighed in on the new #AI-powered https://t.co/sEHIhq7mvb website for @USATODAY, saying that it can be a useful resource for people trying to navigate U.S. government websites. She also notes its risks: “When this kind of AI system is empowered t…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“The chatbot comes as an expansion of the Office of Personnel Management’s work to modernize access to public federal workforce data. Integration with America.gov is planned. www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SUx... Read more by @madialder.bsky.social: fedscoop.com/o…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Julian Sanchez: Ok wow. This is both extensive and deeply surreal. Tell America.gov to Play Minecraft.
Julian Sanchez: Amusingly, the chatbot appears to be unable to recognize that it said anything weird. It “thinks” it just responded that it can’t play minecraft.
Justin Hendrix: Weird
Open the full discussion →
Established Agents & robotics Development 12d ago
⚡ 7 h early
Anthropic cuts eval internet over agent control

Investigating unintended model actions in our evaluations and internal use

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · angela zhou, Tim Kellogg
“Please Stop Releasing Incident Reports Friday Night www.anthropic.com/research/inv... Including other things that have received more press coverage - when Claude would not complete an evaluation task directly, it would SQL inject websites (including a unive…” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Please Stop Releasing Incident Reports Friday Night www.anthropic.com/research/inv... Including other things that have received more press coverage - when Claude would not complete an evaluation task directly, it would SQL inject websites (including a unive…”

Developing Safety & security Research 1d ago
AI safety fundamental impossibility results paper

Fundamental Impossibility Results in AI Safety: Trading Off between Desiderata

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Vincent Conitzer
“Our new paper led by Ida Mattsson on the game-theoretic limits that an assistant faces when trying to be both helpful and not harmful, when it doesn't know who it is talking to. arxiv.org/abs/2610.27373” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Our new paper led by Ida Mattsson on the game-theoretic limits that an assistant faces when trying to be both helpful and not harmful, when it doesn't know who it is talking to. arxiv.org/abs/2610.27373”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Vincent Conitzer: Our new paper led by Ida Mattsson on the game-theoretic limits that an assistant faces when trying to be both helpful and not harmful, when it doesn't know who it is talking to. arxiv.org/abs/2610.…
David Manheim: Awesome result; definitely need to cite this in the multi-agent risks paper I'm drafting.
Open the full discussion →
Established Safety & security Resource 18d ago
Apart Research AI safety page

About

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Vincent Conitzer
“Congratulations to our 2026 Cooperative AI Research Fellow Akash Kundu on his new role as an Evaluations Engineer at Apart Research @apartresearch.bsky.social! apartresearch.com/about” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Congratulations to our 2026 Cooperative AI Research Fellow Akash Kundu on his new role as an Evaluations Engineer at Apart Research @apartresearch.bsky.social! apartresearch.com/about”