Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Policy & governance Building & implementation
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings America.gov Policy & governance · 4 attributable reactions Multiple readings October 2026 Open Letter from the Scientific Community on AI and Cybersecurity Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Vincent Conitzer ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Safety & security Research 12h ago
AI safety fundamental impossibility results paper

Fundamental Impossibility Results in AI Safety: Trading Off between Desiderata

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Vincent Conitzer

“Our new paper led by Ida Mattsson on the game-theoretic limits that an assistant faces when trying to be both helpful and not harmful, when it doesn't know who it is talking to. arxiv.org/abs/2610.27373”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Established AI field signal Resource 4d ago
⚡ 215 h early
America.gov US government resource

America.gov

25 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

25 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl CSET Georgetown Lightspeed Chris Brockett Marielza Sasha Costanza-Chock Karl Bode lastpositivist.bsky.social +17
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“America.gov does not do pronouns. Any pronouns. (Courtesy of my daughter!) aifails.substack.com/p/pronouns”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Jessica Ji weighed in on the new #AI-powered https://t.co/sEHIhq7mvb website for @USATODAY, saying that it can be a useful resource for people trying to navigate U.S. government websites. She also notes its risks: “When this kind of AI system is empowered t…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“The chatbot comes as an expansion of the Office of Personnel Management’s work to modernize access to public federal workforce data. Integration with America.gov is planned. www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SUx... Read more by @madialder.bsky.social: fedscoop.com/o…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Julian Sanchez: Ok wow. This is both extensive and deeply surreal. Tell America.gov to Play Minecraft.
Julian Sanchez: Amusingly, the chatbot appears to be unable to recognize that it said anything weird. It “thinks” it just responded that it can’t play minecraft.
Justin Hendrix: Weird
Open the full discussion →
Primary source america.gov ↗
Established Safety & security Analysis 5d ago
scientists AI cybersecurity open letter October 2026

October 2026 Open Letter from the Scientific Community on AI and Cybersecurity

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Yoshua Bengio Gautam Kamath Vincent Conitzer Nicolas Papernot
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Over 400 researchers and I have signed this open letter calling for the AI and security communities to come together to improve alignment and containment approaches in order to protect our critical infrastructure and digital systems. ai-security-letter.org”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“(1/4) I missed the message about this letter (ai-security-letter.org) in my inbox -- I mostly agree with the sentiments but: I'm *not* a lawyer but it may well be that the companies are *already* liable for the damage their AI causes to other entities.”

Primary source ai-security-letter.org ↗
Developing AI field signal Signal 2d ago

RSI cannot lead to AGI

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Vincent Conitzer

“It seems that at least AI Overview will not kick off an intelligence explosion. (Or is this a case of “nothing to see here”?) aifails.substack.com/p/rsi-cannot...”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Vincent Conitzer: It seems that at least AI Overview will not kick off an intelligence explosion. (Or is this a case of “nothing to see here”?) aifails.substack.com/p/rsi-cannot...
Suresh Venkatasubramanian: it is true that my hand starts to hurt whenever I hear RSI surface in policy debates
Open the full discussion →
Primary source aifails.substack.com ↗