Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Questions & unknowns Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Hugging face model evaluation security incident Concern & critique · 5 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Carlos Scheidegger ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 13d ago
⚡ 1 h early

Hugging face model evaluation security incident

22 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Ethan Mollick, Vincent Conitzer, Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)
“Previously, these AI hacking stories were about breaches in test environments, where any question of AI breaching security was purely theoretical. This is something else. openai.com/index/huggin...” evidence ↗
22 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Ethan Mollick Thomas Steinke Jeffrey P. Bigham Eryk Salvaggio Deedy Das Mor Naaman Tim Kellogg Djamé 🟥 +14
6 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Grace: This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...
Grace: Maybe the most concerning part is the OpenAI claim to not have known about this before investigating?
Grace: Well, I think the model passed the test
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openai.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 8 posts · 18d ago
rev. howard arson Carlos Scheidegger Joshua Grochow
Matches Concern & critique
“Specifically, I think you're responding to a concern that is outside what this thread and paper is about.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Context & explanation · 1
rev. howard arson: the mechanism behind this is that if you don't do your homework you don't learn the topic
rev. howard arson: that is the conclusion of the study, based on the data
Open the thread →
2 experts · 9 posts · 20d ago
Michael Ekstrand Carlos Scheidegger
Matches Concern & critique
“I have. I might have exploited that claim once or twice. (I have also recently been staring into the confusing abyss of Rust Yaml parsers for… reasons. I think I saw a wrapper y'all published from …” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Questions & unknowns · 2
Carlos Scheidegger: Everyone looks at three dashes and makes an LLM joke. Understandable! I look at them and get “oh god please not another yaml delimiter bug” flashbacks
Michael Ekstrand: is there a widely-used markup / data interchange language more cursed than yaml?
Open the thread →