Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Damien Williams ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 13d ago
⚡ 2 h early

Sam altman decoded interview ai

12 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Damien Williams, Dare Obasanjo
“Remember when us phil-tech types said effective altruism was just utilitarianism taken to its worst possible extents? This is what we meant: Real harm for unquantifiable potential benefit. "…'we believe that the world should accept some bad things happening…” evidence ↗
12 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 10 posts
e.w. niedermeyer: he really does look like he's about to step off into a bold new future with none of us in it
Mary Branscombe: Right over the cliff
e.w. niedermeyer: the new Vanity Fair cover seems to subtly propose an interesting possibility: perhaps Sam Altman just has to accept some bad things happening in the name of human flourishing? www.politico.com/news…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 6 posts · 15d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Oh don’t worry, they can make it more hamfisted than that” evidence ↗
Pavel: If AI was real, it would be able to tell the difference between adding an emoji to your name, and an attempt to impersonate the FBI.
Pavel: they did it to avoid this specific situation, in the most hamfisted way possible
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 7d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Our society does real fucked up things to people & character AI intentionally built itself out to prey on the people in those vulnerable spaces. I'm glad the company is dying but it is legitimately…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
Damien Williams: Our society does real fucked up things to people & character AI intentionally built itself out to prey on the people in those vulnerable spaces. I'm glad the company is dying but it is legitimately…
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: I keep thinking that a core problem, not only with AI or social media, but the deployment of software in society generally, is how much the industry relies on being able to conduct social and indiv…
Open the thread →