Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Policy & governance reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by david-p-reichert.bsky.social ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Policy & governance Signal 13d ago
⚡ 1055 h early

Usage Policy

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Dustin Moskovitz, david-p-reichert.bsky.social
“"API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). This request triggered cyber-related safeguards. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit…” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 10 posts
Kat Tenbarge: Anthropic banning “abusive or cruel behavior” toward Claude in its new usage policies is proof to me that tech companies are going to moderate violence against AI before they ever moderate violence…
Alex Hanna: Anthropic banning “abusive or cruel behavior” toward Claude in its new usage policies is proof to me that tech companies are going to moderate violence against AI before they ever moderate violence…
Neil Turkewitz: 🙏🏽🎯 God, the irony of Anthropic restricting “abusive or cruel behavior” towards Claude while operating a system dependent on stolen property which effectively recapitulates its origin story by erod…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 83 posts · 7d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“And how is "AI might deserve moral consideration" a good way to avoid regulation?” evidence ↗
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: (Checks the replies since I replied) Thoughts and prayers What I like is you posted it thoughtfully and not with exaggeration or hyperbole
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: I also like you caught the distinction I missed, agents not LLMs. I need to be more careful with my language
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 8d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“anthropic cares about safety as long as it is purely hypothetical safety that does not meaningfully impede their operations or profitability. they got into an argument with the government about a h…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
SE Gyges: anthropic cares about safety as long as it is purely hypothetical safety that does not meaningfully impede their operations or profitability. they got into an argument with the government about a h…
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: Can I ask, in your view, how do you think Anthropic compares to the other labs here?
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 8d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“Generally agree, though feels like it also depends on the specifics... Like the nature of the government in question and who's currently in charge of it...” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: Like, I don't agree with their arguments! But if you follow their own arguments to their conclusions, they literally should not be allowed to pursue their own research without extreme government ov…
Eugene Vinitsky: Most AI doom arguments are implicitly arguments for nationalizing the labs.
Open the thread →