Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,304 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Deedy Das ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 1d ago
⚡ 1 h early

Hugging face model evaluation security incident

20 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Ethan Mollick, Vincent Conitzer, Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)
“Previously, these AI hacking stories were about breaches in test environments, where any question of AI breaching security was purely theoretical. This is something else. openai.com/index/huggin...” evidence ↗
20 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
6 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Grace: This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...
Grace: Maybe the most concerning part is the OpenAI claim to not have known about this before investigating?
Grace: Well, I think the model passed the test
Open the full discussion →
Developing Safety & security Development 1d ago
HuggingFace security incident July 2026

Security incident disclosure — July 2026

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Leon Derczynski
“"When we started analysis, we used commercial APIs. This did not work: requests were blocked by the providers' safety guardrails. We ran the forensic analysis instead on our own infra: no attacker data, and none of the credentials it referenced, left our en…” evidence ↗
7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“"When we started analysis, we used commercial APIs. This did not work: requests were blocked by the providers' safety guardrails. We ran the forensic analysis instead on our own infra: no attacker data, and none of the credentials it referenced, left our en…”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“These programs are made from humanity's collective efforts. It's vital that their code and weights be available to all human beings, not just so that progress can be iterated faster, but also so that bad actors can be stopped faster as well. Great example h…”