Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by David Marx ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

10 experts · 32 posts · 11d ago
Pwnallthethings Mike Caulfield SE Gyges David Marx jake John David Pressman tweety fish Mary Branscombe
Matches Concern & critique
“and like insofar as that's a worry the solutions offered (a human understands the mechanism) are not solutions that are available for existing drugs, so the takeaway I think is that clinical trials…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
SE Gyges: i hate this
SE Gyges: it tells me that that fucking guy who stood up and said this shit at Neurips managed to set this as an acceptable, within-overton-window way of being pissed off about ai it isn't and anyone who say…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 14 posts · 17d ago
Ted Underwood David Marx critical slop studies rev. howard arson tweety fish Arseny Khakhalin
Matches Concern & critique
“not at all. you don't have to be super polite but you probably should not treat it in a way you would not treat a human subordinate. it's just "one should not anthropomorphize an object for the pur…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
rev. howard arson: it is really fascinating how LLMs make virtually everyone say things which are enormously controversial as though they are solved problems
critical slop studies: Has anyone told him about the humans who don’t feel pain?
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 6d ago
Sung Kim David Marx
Matches Concern & critique
“two points of constructive criticism: 1. If your program's API is appropriately testable, you shouldn't need to spin up a separate API for the agent. They should be able to invoke the same API your…” evidence ↗
Sung Kim: You'll be surprised how many unexpected bugs and inconsistencies this approach uncovers, even when your existing tests pass. Make sure the agent verifies expected results and application state chan…
Sung Kim: One effective approach is to have your AI coding agent create an API using the OpenAPI standard, generate an SDK, and then use that SDK to perform black box testing against the running app.
Open the thread →