Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by David Marx ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Agents & robotics Signal 16d ago
⚡ 1924 h early

GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · David Marx
“My understanding is that despite the fairly generalized way in which this papers claims are authored, the experiments actually render this a much narrower criticism of "GEPA" specifically, which is a particular prompt-rewriting strategy.” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established Culture, work & education Resource 15d ago
MIT CSAIL Wikipedia reference

MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory - Wikipedia

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · David Marx
“holy shit I had no idea CSAIL was housed in such a crazy building lookit that fucking thing” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“holy shit I had no idea CSAIL was housed in such a crazy building lookit that fucking thing”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

10 experts · 32 posts · 11d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“and like insofar as that's a worry the solutions offered (a human understands the mechanism) are not solutions that are available for existing drugs, so the takeaway I think is that clinical trials…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
SE Gyges: i hate this
SE Gyges: it tells me that that fucking guy who stood up and said this shit at Neurips managed to set this as an acceptable, within-overton-window way of being pissed off about ai it isn't and anyone who say…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 14 posts · 17d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“not at all. you don't have to be super polite but you probably should not treat it in a way you would not treat a human subordinate. it's just "one should not anthropomorphize an object for the pur…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
rev. howard arson: it is really fascinating how LLMs make virtually everyone say things which are enormously controversial as though they are solved problems
critical slop studies: Has anyone told him about the humans who don’t feel pain?
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 6d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“two points of constructive criticism: 1. If your program's API is appropriately testable, you shouldn't need to spin up a separate API for the agent. They should be able to invoke the same API your…” evidence ↗
Sung Kim: You'll be surprised how many unexpected bugs and inconsistencies this approach uncovers, even when your existing tests pass. Make sure the agent verifies expected results and application state chan…
Sung Kim: One effective approach is to have your AI coding agent create an API using the OpenAPI standard, generate an SDK, and then use that SDK to perform black box testing against the running app.
Open the thread →