Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Opportunity & adoption
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Ai hugging face big tech danger Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Eli Sennesh ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 5d ago
⚡ 26 h early

Ai hugging face big tech danger

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Justin Hendrix
“"We know what to do: incubate open-access A.I. models, regulate technologies before they go rogue, hold the people who allow them to go rogue accountable if they do and protect the most vulnerable when we, the people, sometimes get it wrong." - @tressiemcph…” evidence ↗
7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Alondra Nelson Justin Hendrix Luke Stark Eli Sennesh Dare Obasanjo Aram Sinnreich Nathalie Maréchal, PhD
2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Dare Obasanjo: Two ideas from this article resonate 1. The “rogue AI agent” hacking incidents are more failures of test design and oversight than examples of runaway AI. 2. Focus on existential risk helps distrac…
Dare Obasanjo: We’re going to see a lot more AI-assisted botnets and hacking because botnets are software, and software is increasingly being built and operated with AI. That doesn’t require a Skynet story. Hacki…
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): Two ideas from this article resonate 1. The “rogue AI agent” hacking incidents are more failures of test design and oversight than examples of runaway AI. 2. Focus on existential risk helps distrac…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source nytimes.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 14 posts · 6d ago
Eugene Vinitsky angela zhou Ramon Astudillo Claas Voelcker Eli Sennesh
Matches Concern & critique
“There’s a bit too much emphasis on incentives and not enough on 1-1 shame. You’re the guy in charge of targeting people with gambling addictions? You shouldn’t be able to tell people your job. You …” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: There’s a bit too much emphasis on incentives and not enough on 1-1 shame. You’re the guy in charge of targeting people with gambling addictions? You shouldn’t be able to tell people your job. You …
Eugene Vinitsky: Need systems to become just much more honest. Hopefully we can do this without simultaneously becoming toxic.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 8 posts · 3d ago
Eli Sennesh rev. howard arson ae
Matches Concern & critique
“intuitively, this does not seem like initial condition problem to me, especially because the inductive bias transforms from a genetic trait not instantiated in any concrete form into a pattern of c…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
rev. howard arson: i do think that one intuition pump is "how does a coding agent's relation to code after RLVR differ conceptually from a sensorimotor representation."
Eli Sennesh: Yes?
Open the thread →