Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Context & explanation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Context & explanation Opportunity & adoption Research & technical analysis
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings cims.nyu.edu Concern & critique · 4 attributable reactions Reaction converging Navier stokes solution Research & technical analysis · 6 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Emad ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 20d ago
⚡ 19 h early

cims.nyu.edu

19 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Context & explanation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Dan McQuillan
“AI maths meets mafia: "I said if OpenAI released its result in the way proposed I would go public with what happened. The reply was “Why would you ruin your career?” I replied that I'm an academic, & asked why he thought going public would ruin my career" c…” evidence ↗
19 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Emily M. Bender Emad Gary Marcus Alondra Nelson Timnit Gebru Clément Canonne Ramon Astudillo +11
2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Kashmir Hill: Did not wake up realizing that “did OpenAI cheat on the homework” would be the most exciting social media drama of the day cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/st...
Alondra Nelson: Did not wake up realizing that “did OpenAI cheat on the homework” would be the most exciting social media drama of the day cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/st...
Alondra Nelson: Indeed!
Open the full discussion →
Primary source cims.nyu.edu ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 18d ago
⚡ 7 h early

Navier stokes solution

14 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Context & explanation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ethan Mollick
“This is a VERY big one. (And yes, the fights over academic credit and what happened in the race for the proof needs to be resolved, but it is still appears that this is a big one, if true.) openai.com/index/navier...” evidence ↗
14 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Emad Ethan Mollick Tim Kellogg Scott McGrath David Picard Alex Hern Sean O hEigeartaigh Dare Obasanjo +6
3 experts discussed this · 12 posts
Colin: Drama and palace intrigue aside, can anyone interpret what all of this implies about the status of Navier-Stokes? I don’t understand what anyone is saying.
Colin: It seems to me that where we stand is OpenAI is sitting on a 100 page PDF that claims to have solved (a version of) the Navier-Stokes problem and no person in the world knows if it's correct or not.
Colin: - OpenAI claims to have more-or-less done this tedious technical grinding to produce a resolution to NS proper, at least one version of it. - which they bizarrely offered authorship of this to Buck…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openai.com ↗