Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Context & explanation Opportunity & adoption
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings cims.nyu.edu Concern & critique · 4 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by futur.blue ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 18d ago
⚡ 19 h early

cims.nyu.edu

19 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Emad, Tim Kellogg
“Wow, Navier-Stokes drama This statement is worth reading in full from Tristan Buckmaster discussing his work with @__alpoge__ and OpenAI’s upcoming Condition C/D result (!) Crazy https://t.co/EnCVLyjgEZ https://t.co/ZLqBagNNcX https://t.co/3zFFth8uYd” evidence ↗
19 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Emily M. Bender Emad Gary Marcus Alondra Nelson Timnit Gebru Clément Canonne Ramon Astudillo +11
2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Kashmir Hill: Did not wake up realizing that “did OpenAI cheat on the homework” would be the most exciting social media drama of the day cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/st...
Alondra Nelson: Did not wake up realizing that “did OpenAI cheat on the homework” would be the most exciting social media drama of the day cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/st...
Alondra Nelson: Indeed!
Open the full discussion →
Primary source cims.nyu.edu ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

10 experts · 16 posts · 19d ago
Ryan Moulton Grace Dustin Moskovitz SE Gyges Marco Z austin Andrea Lathrop Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦
Matches Concern & critique
“OpenAI steals back the Mandate of Heaven!” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Grace: 👀
futur.blue: I think it's extremely unlikely buckmaster's chat logs would've made it into training data such that a model could make use of that knowledge in a matter of days, but it's interesting that oai refu…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 10 posts · 20d ago
James MacGlashan SE Gyges critical slop studies futur.blue
Matches Concern & critique
“she's right about that one, and also about various bias reinforcement, and also that technology frequently empowers some of the worst people on earth because that's who already has power” evidence ↗
SE Gyges: "Why would you ruin your career?" is such an insulting and sinister thing to say, he's non-specifically acting like he wants to deny it rn but I think we can call that someone got entirely too high…
SE Gyges: oh shit the marching orders went out on slack
Open the thread →