Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Hagen Blix ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 5 posts · 9d ago
Hagen Blix Amy Hoy
Matches Building & implementation
“i actually have a disorder that causes inappropriate saccade and boy do i wish that was a separate app written in react that i could debug or replace and not, like, an integrated system that cannot…” evidence ↗
Amy Hoy: me: so it’s obvious that llms aren’t conscious bc they have no memory, no persistence, each turn is totally fresh, it’s fakery random dude: yeah well your perception is also an illusion bc of sacca…
Hagen Blix: I keep saying, LLMs are a P-Zombie detector
Open the thread →