“Why do I always have to give you physicists so much money, for laboratories and expensive equipment? Why couldn't you be like the math department? All they need is money for pencils, paper and wast…” evidence ↗
The Who's Who of AI
What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.
Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.
See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.
Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.
No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.
The questions experts are actively pulling apart
One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.
No developments match these filters yet.
Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.
Clear filtersWhat experts are discussing without an anchoring article
“i was told that LLMs are always optimized towards a fixed benchmark, i mentioned you could create a living benchmark that moved to people's tastes but could never be strictly satiated, was told tha…” evidence ↗
“my take on agentic systems is that they're the hand-engineered way to do inference-time scaling and that the a lot of the core work there should and will be bitter-lessoned away eventually.” evidence ↗
“(this is secretly a post about anthropic's "j-space" paper)” evidence ↗
“large scale training, especially RL gets very big. very parallel. thousands of instances of the model all running at once. the latency between all those instances is quite sensitive, so density mat…” evidence ↗