Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Concern & critique Policy & governance
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Live tension Pacing the Frontier Building & implementation · 4 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Jasmine Wang ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Analysis 11h ago
Pacing the Frontier newsletter essay

Pacing the Frontier

10 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Jan Leike, Anna Mills
“I'm not the only one who believes this. Recently 1,386 employees of frontier AI companies signed a statement asking for an option to pace AI development, including 6 chief scientists: https://t.co/DYmc5ETmut” evidence ↗
10 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Jan Leike Yoshua Bengio Sung Kim Anna Mills Jasmine Wang SE Gyges Stephen Turner Fran Litterio +2
How the network is reacting The reaction spans practical upside and material concerns.
Live tension

Building & implementation

2 experts

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“I'm not the only one who believes this. Recently 1,386 employees of frontier AI companies signed a statement asking for an option to pace AI development, including 6 chief scientists: https://t.co/DYmc5ETmut”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“1000+ scientists at frontier AI companies are speaking out to warn that the current commercial race leads to unacceptable security risks. I agree with their call for an international effort to develop technical and governance guardrails to ensure a safer wa…”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“"We request that the U.S. government support an international effort to develop the technical and governance tools needed to deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development." www.pacingthefrontier.com”

Primary source pacingthefrontier.com ↗