Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Jed Brown ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI research Research 21h ago
⚡ 5 h early

Contra Literacy-Laundering: Mechanistic Critical AI Literacy | Zenodo

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“And also: Ray, I. & Guest, O. (2026). Contra Literacy-Laundering: Mechanistic Critical AI Literacy. Zenodo. doi.org/10.5281/zeno...”

3 experts discussed this · 24 posts
Olivia Guest: New preprint! So honoured to have worked with Ishani Ray on providing vital critique on "AI literacy" & correctives for those interested in understanding why "just use the newest version of an LLM"…
Olivia Guest: Maybe many mid-career and above academics have my experience, and so can relate, but it never ever gets any less impressive, overwhelming, or old when a student appears our of nowhere (notice our g…
Olivia Guest: Anyway, back to the work itself (from the abstract): > Critical discourse on large language models (LLMs) has bifurcated between epistemic dismissal [...] and pragmatic accommodation that treats LL…
Open the full discussion →
New AI field signal Analysis 19h ago
⚡ 793 h early
critical AI essay olivia science

Critical AI

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“If you're in psychology or any of the cognitive sciences please consider that AI is more than a harmful piece of hype or pollutes the environment but also actively destroys our ability to do our science. A lot of my work related to this is here: olivia.scie…”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“@olivia.science of course has a great collection including a lot of her own research olivia.science/ai/”

2 experts discussed this · 9 posts
Olivia Guest: There's no engineering reason for human shaped robots other than that one actually. And there's so many engineering reasons against. The sooner people realise it has always been true & sexist (oliv…
Olivia Guest: Also see: bsky.app/profile/oliv... 2/
Thomas Dietterich: My colleague Jonathan Hurst (at Agility Robotics) has a long list of reasons why humanoid robots make sense. For years he was opposed to humanoids, but he found that for lifting and carrying loads,…
Open the full discussion →
Established Models & releases Research 9d ago
⚡ 4 h early
LLMs distort written language paper

How LLMs Distort Our Written Language

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

3 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Fantastic paper demonstrating how LLM editing is gradually distorting our writing and the way we think to write: arxiv.org/abs/2603.18161”

3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Eugene Vinitsky: Fantastic paper demonstrating how LLM editing is gradually distorting our writing and the way we think to write: arxiv.org/abs/2603.18161
Eugene Vinitsky: Sitting in Marwa's fantastic PhD defense, trying my best not to just retweet all her papers
Isaiah Bishop: Fantastic paper demonstrating how LLM editing is gradually distorting our writing and the way we think to write: arxiv.org/abs/2603.18161
Open the full discussion →
Developing AI field signal Resource 1d ago
⚡ 236 h early
OSF open science framework platform

OSF

5 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Erscoi, L., Kleinherenbrink, A., & Guest, O. (2023). Pygmalion Displacement: When Humanising AI Dehumanises Women. SocArXiv. doi.org/10.31235/osf...”

“I think these might be helpful! Erscoi, L., Kleinherenbrink, A., & Guest, O. (2023). Pygmalion Displacement: When Humanising AI Dehumanises Women. SocArXiv. doi.org/10.31235/osf...”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Olivia Guest: Ignoring this crucial distinction is BTW at the root of many instances of xenophobia/racism. People often assume that "defective" output (i. e. non-native register) equals a lack of cognitive capac…
Olivia Guest: I have lots on this angle of you're interested 🫶🏼 Sexism: doi.org/10.31235/osf... Racism: doi.org/10.48550/arX... Also... bsky.app/profile/oliv... and more but I'll not overwhelm you needlessly!
Iris van Rooij: Also here bsky.app/profile/iris...
Open the full discussion →
Developing AI field signal Signal 2d ago

Ghost in the Machine | A.I. Documentary | Independent Lens

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“So good! I hosted an on-campus screening in the spring (about 60 people) and many stayed for almost 2 hours of discussion afterward. I'm excited for it to be out on PBS on Monday.”

3 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Andrew D Wilson: QED 🙄
Adam Becker: @davekarpf.bsky.social has a proposed solution to this, which I am wildly biased in favor of but I do still think is a good idea: davekarpf.beehiiv.com/p/book-revie...
Adam Becker: yeah I screamed out loud when I read that part
Open the full discussion →
Established Compute & infrastructure Signal 5d ago

Western government leaders call for a focus on infrastructure resilience, not AI hype

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“The actual exploits are not nearly so fancy. And what is needed is mostly boring old-fashioned infrastructure resilience.”

2 experts discussed this · 7 posts
Meredith Rose: I think it's simpler than that: they simply do not understand what they're building. And that's a problem that has been around for a while in machine learning. There's a point of complexity past wh…
Meredith Rose: The "it's all marketing hype" is an understandable reflex, because the marketers have been the ones driving policy. Now frontier labs are in a position where, when (not if!) there *is* a serious ri…
Meredith Rose: This is the worst possible state of affairs. There ARE very serious risks, we do NOT know what these tools are capable of, and a huge swath of the population won't believe that the risk is real bec…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 37 posts · 1h ago
Reaction converging Policy & governance · 4 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Amanda Tepski: In rebuttal to “legal? ai is getting there” I offer www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinatio...
Jed Brown: And beyond law, is a 67% error rate good for medicine? Is it normal medical practice to suppress data misconduct and 10 independent whistleblowers? It's only "getting there" when conditions to bypa…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 13 posts · 3h ago
Shared emphasis Policy & governance · 2
Jeff Sharlet: Is AI gonna kill us by launching nukes or whatever? Dunno, but I'm more puzzled at the leftists & liberals saying "akshually" to the idea--and the window it opens for regulation--because the whethe…
Jeff Sharlet: Of course I get this might be marketing or some other BS. But why are people trying to “akshually” the first time politicians are seriously talking about slowing down AI? Why do we care more about …
Open the thread →