Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Ai chatbots brain development study Building & implementation · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 18d ago

Ai chatbots brain development study

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis
“I'll tell you what makes us stupid: this inane trend in newspaper design. Will A.I. Make Your Brain Lazy? Here’s What the New Research Actually Shows. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...” evidence ↗
5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Luke Stark Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Jason Moore Edouard Machery Dr Keith Wilson 🏳️‍🌈
Primary source nytimes.com ↗
Established Models & releases Signal 9d ago

Saudi national charged with bugging openais office 7e960aad

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis
“Why toilet paper? Weird idea of conference-room camouflage. An OpenAI engineer allegedly hid a mic wrapped in toilet paper in a room used for top-secret meetings. www.wsj.com/tech/ai/saud...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis

“Why toilet paper? Weird idea of conference-room camouflage. An OpenAI engineer allegedly hid a mic wrapped in toilet paper in a room used for top-secret meetings. www.wsj.com/tech/ai/saud...”

Primary source wsj.com ↗
Established Models & releases Signal 9d ago

Saudi national charged with bugging openais office 7e960aad

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis
“Why toilet paper? Weird idea of conference-room camouflage. An OpenAI engineer allegedly hid a mic wrapped in toilet paper in a room used for top-secret meetings. www.wsj.com/tech/ai/saud...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis

“Why toilet paper? Weird idea of conference-room camouflage. An OpenAI engineer allegedly hid a mic wrapped in toilet paper in a room used for top-secret meetings. www.wsj.com/tech/ai/saud...”

Primary source wsj.com ↗
Established AI research Signal 17d ago

AI has a 0.48% chance of killing a tenth of humanity by 2030, Penn professor says

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis
“Put a number on bullshit, it's still bullshit. "Tetlock’s Forecasting Research Institute uses leading AI models to calculate the probability of AI-related disasters." AI has a 0.48% chance of killing a tenth of humanity by 2030, Penn professor says www.thed…” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis

“Put a number on bullshit, it's still bullshit. "Tetlock’s Forecasting Research Institute uses leading AI models to calculate the probability of AI-related disasters." AI has a 0.48% chance of killing a tenth of humanity by 2030, Penn professor says www.thed…”

Primary source thedp.com ↗