Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Concern & critique Policy & governance Research & technical analysis
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Ai chatbots brain development study Building & implementation · 2 attributable reactions Multiple readings Anthropic ai safety Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 18d ago

Ai chatbots brain development study

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Luke Stark Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Jason Moore Edouard Machery Dr Keith Wilson 🏳️‍🌈
Primary source nytimes.com ↗
Established Safety & security Signal 4d ago

Anthropic ai safety

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Andrea Lathrop
4 experts discussed this · 7 posts
Mark Riedl: Snark alert: let me just note that some employees of OpenAI and Anthropic already “foresee” a 10% chance of 8 billion people.
Mark Riedl: Anthropic floats a sample bill. It would allow the gov’t to block a model that has a “foreseeable, imminent risk of more than $1 billion in damages, or of killing or seriously injuring more than 50…
Andrea Lathrop: (but with this bill, they can only get shut down if METR foresees it for them.)
Open the full discussion →
Primary source politico.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 10d ago

theatlantic.com

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Shriram Krishnamurthi

“If AI eliminated prizes like this, I'd cheer, for they exclude pluralism, as if one among countless works that please judges can be crowned "best" for all. AI mocks prizes by caricaturing prize-winners. Yet Another Literary Prizewinner Seems to Be AI www.th…”

“Hi @vauhinivara.bsky.social — I love your work, including this Atlantic piece [ www.theatlantic.com/books/2026/1... ], but was really surprised (not entirely in a good way) by the way you presented Pangram: ↵”

Primary source theatlantic.com ↗
Established Culture, work & education Development 6d ago
UK smart glasses AI surveillance Westminster

The eyes have it: Reform politician’s ‘smart glasses’ prompt calls for ban in Westminster

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis

“Digital puritanism: MP apparently and harmlessly uses glasses as teleprompter with no evidence he's recording (and what would it matter as the event is on video?) but that sparks calls for banning them. Get a grip. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...”

Primary source theguardian.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 11d ago

Ai books fiction black writers racism

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis

“Prizes too often eschew diversity; AI doubts attack diversity: "The five literary scandals around A.I. that I consider most significant this year have each focused on Black and brown writers." When Black Writers Are Guilty Until Proved Human www.nytimes.com…”

Primary source nytimes.com ↗
Established AI research Signal 17d ago

AI has a 0.48% chance of killing a tenth of humanity by 2030, Penn professor says

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis

“Put a number on bullshit, it's still bullshit. "Tetlock’s Forecasting Research Institute uses leading AI models to calculate the probability of AI-related disasters." AI has a 0.48% chance of killing a tenth of humanity by 2030, Penn professor says www.thed…”

Primary source thedp.com ↗
Established AI field signal Development 16d ago
AI frontlines social good video

Frontlines of Social Good: 9/23/2026

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis

“On the Frontlines of Social Good podcast, I spoke about the opportunities and obligations philanthropies have in the time of AI: how they can help protect against actual (not fictional) risks, support competitive research, and inform public discourse. youtu…”

Primary source youtu.be ↗