Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Juan Diego Rodriguez ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 7d ago
⚡ 17 h early

63e8a4f3 7c18 4ddc b3b7 e472159a7adf

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“Those “who own our algorithms, who own our cable news networks . . . they and their platforms are engineering our emotions so they can profit off our pain. They are selling us conflict, and they’re calling it connection.” www.ft.com/content/63e8...”

Established Safety & security Analysis 14d ago
alignment artificiality essay

The Artificiality of Alignment

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“Anyways, here's some of that discourse from 2019; https://t.co/pzBqIF2MEA + Communities like MD4SG, who piloted in 2016; https://t.co/3CQxeNxYiw And folks like @jessicadai_ explicitly drawing bridges to the language of "alignment" in 2023; https://t.co/3etN…”

“joinreboot.org/p/alignment “All of the AI x-risk scenarios involve a world where we have decided to abdicate responsibility to an algorithm…. There are technical challenges, to be sure, but focusing at the scale of technical decisions elides these higher-le…”

Established AI field signal Analysis 5d ago
⚡ 17 h early
AI writing internet takeover essay

We Can't Let AI Writing Take Over the Internet

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“A slop tsunami is “gumming up your LinkedIn feed, oozing through Twitter and Instagram, and filling every square inch of the internet with treacly spam and viscous sham.” www.derekthompson.org/p/the-intern...”

“New pod/transcript: PANGRAM VS THE MACHINE An interview with Pangram founder and CEO Max Spero about why AI writing took over the Web, how Pangram works, why we should trust it, and what he sees as the fundamental differences between machine vs. human writi…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 21 posts · 8d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 2 Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: Repulsed by the idea that we should sit idly by while frontier labs determine the trajectory of the AI transition. They don’t know how to make systems “safe” or “aligned“ nor do any such notions ma…
Eugene Vinitsky: I think, without ever acknowledging it explicitly, I had sort of resigned myself to this. But now I feel weirdly re-inspired to do some useful work here
Open the thread →