Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Arseny Khakhalin ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 17d ago
⚡ 7 h early

Navier stokes solution

14 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

14 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 12 posts
Colin: Drama and palace intrigue aside, can anyone interpret what all of this implies about the status of Navier-Stokes? I don’t understand what anyone is saying.
Colin: what I gather - Buckmaster & Alpöge answered questions about the Euler equations, which are not exactly the Navier-Stokes equations, but are similar - It's plausible on the surface that the same ap…
Colin: - OpenAI claims to have more-or-less done this tedious technical grinding to produce a resolution to NS proper, at least one version of it. - which they bizarrely offered authorship of this to Buck…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 36 posts · 2d ago
Reaction converging Building & implementation · 3 Questions & unknowns · 1
jake: What's my advice, as An Old SWE, given <all this>? As a Jr SWE, I think it is in fact, still useful to force yourself to learn good algorithms and data structures and how databases work (like reall…
jake: why? well first, the caveat: if you don't want to be a SWE, you don't need this at all, just learn to get good answers out of the models. and: we may not need anywhere near as many high-powered (an…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 23 posts · 7d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ted Underwood: as a longtime textcel I regret to inform that voice input is really good now and you should try it if you haven't recently
Cat Hicks: In my experience, as I deal with significant hand impairment right now, it's a trainable skill that many of us just haven't trained probably A couple of months ago I was incredibly bad at writing m…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 9 posts · 18d ago
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Doll: A lot of the scary results doll has tried to replicate and have not approached anything close to them during normal operations and even some abnormal ones. Misaligned behavior has a root, human cau…
Doll: Its an industrual production system and it will mash your fingers if youre being an idiot.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 14d ago
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
Alex Hern: The semantic drift of “AI psychosis” from “break with reality exacerbated or caused by sycophantic chatbots” to “person with strong feelings about AI which are not the same as the strong feelings o…
Simon Willison: The semantic drift of “AI psychosis” from “break with reality exacerbated or caused by sycophantic chatbots” to “person with strong feelings about AI which are not the same as the strong feelings o…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 11d ago
Shared emphasis Building & implementation · 2
Arseny Khakhalin: Are other GPT models (Sol?) better at that? It's funny how Fable is so nice at coding, but is horrible in prose, while GPT models seem to be so much nicer in prose, but are weirdly bloady and unstr…
Arseny Khakhalin: And also would it mean that the optimal workflow would be to have Fable write the code, and then Sol write the comments?
Open the thread →