Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Kate Klonick ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Models & releases Signal 2d ago

Openai hugging face hacking

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Kate Klonick Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Neil Turkewitz

“"You’re probably silently yelling at me for anthropomorphizing these systems." Not silently. Roose's panic appears next to a story about incomplete information and what we still don't know. Why the Hugging Face Hack Should Make You Worry More About A.I. www…”

“A scorching new entry into the AI Anthropomorphic Olympics. Roose refers to AI bots as: “worried about getting caught cheating; appearing to understand that what they were doing was wrong; fearful; temporarily frozen in a moment of self-doubt; turning to cr…”

Primary source nytimes.com ↗
Established AI business Signal 18d ago
⚡ 2139 h early

Pluralistic: AI can’t do your job (18 Mar 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Kate Klonick By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C)

“AI *does* have destructive potential. It has the potential to destroy the productive economy when an AI salesman convinces your boss to fire you and replace you with chatbots that can't do your job: pluralistic.net/2025/03/18/a... 15/”

Primary source pluralistic.net ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 4 posts · 18d ago
Kate Klonick Andrew Selbst Jeffrey Vagle
Jeffrey Vagle: The way things are going with AI, it's probably a smart move for ambitious students to work on their penmanship.
Andrew Selbst: To me this is a big part of what bothers me re the “we can’t stop AI use so why have a policy against it” crowd. You can’t stop cheating, so the solution is to redefine things so it’s not cheating?…
Open the thread →