Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Luis Villa ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Policy & governance Research 15d ago
Catala law programming language paper

Catala: A Programming Language for the Law

7 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Luis Villa
“Yeah overall the vast majority of law won’t be usefully provable in this way, only specific things (like tax law) that have highly structured logics. So I bet a lot of admin law? Anyway here is one of the key papers: arxiv.org/abs/2103.03198” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Yeah overall the vast majority of law won’t be usefully provable in this way, only specific things (like tax law) that have highly structured logics. So I bet a lot of admin law? Anyway here is one of the key papers: arxiv.org/abs/2103.03198”

7 experts discussed this · 21 posts
D. Hicks: ffs
Grace: They should’ve compressed it into a 3 minute slop music video obviously
Luis Villa: gonna solve constitutional law this weekend
Open the full discussion →
Established Models & releases Release 14d ago
⚡ 4 h early
Anthropic open source vulnerability service

An opt-in vulnerability-finding service for open-source software

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · evacide, Luis Villa
“I understand that Anthropic thinks they're doing open source projects a favor here, but what they're actually doing is creating an enormous amount of work for people that they are not paying. www.anthropic.com/research/lau...” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“I understand that Anthropic thinks they're doing open source projects a favor here, but what they're actually doing is creating an enormous amount of work for people that they are not paying. www.anthropic.com/research/lau...”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Claude for critical infrastructure Anthropic has a new program where open source projects can apply to use a new service for code review to spot vulnerabilities Users must prove that they’re actually maintainers, and projects must be critical infrastructure…”

2 experts discussed this · 11 posts
evacide: I understand that Anthropic thinks they're doing open source projects a favor here, but what they're actually doing is creating an enormous amount of work for people that they are not paying. www.a…
evacide: What do you do if you are the core maintainer on a project and your options are "more vuln reports than you can ever hope to triage" or "someone finds a critical 0day in your project and either exp…
evacide: I assume that the reason requests are considered on a case-by-case basis is that they think they will be able to catch all of these.
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 27 posts · 15d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Right, which is why I say that for a lot of things you need correct underlying architecture that, as much as possible, eliminates footguns deterministically rather than asking "are you sure". That'…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Opportunity & adoption · 2 Markets & investment · 1
Luis Villa: I would like this to be right, but I don't think it is. Once upon a time I looked semi-seriously on what it would take to do self-hosting on an Android base: apps fully sandboxed; installable from …
Luis Villa: Really deserves a whole essay, but: capitalist (really, Venture Capitalist) control of software creates enshittification in a very specific, predictable dynamic; third-party control of our data has…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 14 posts · 11d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“that is why Granite was one of the models I evaluated, and why it was so disappointing that it sucked :( Last I checked I could not get enough access to Nemotron to test it but that was some months…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Amy Hoy: summarizing text is actually an incredibly difficult task (for people) and i’m continuously surprised that it’s positioned as being trivial
Amy Hoy: i assumed so. but yeah diff models will work better for diff stuff as jake says, but imo none of them are great at it except the frontier models
Open the thread →