Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Policy & governance reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Marielza ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Development 10h ago
2026 election tech influence results

Crypto and AI’s $250 million election goes sideways

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Neil Turkewitz
““More than 80% of congressional candidates backed by the pro-science PAC 314 Action won.” Meanwhile, “Of the twelve competitive races called so far, the side backed by crypto & AI super PACs lost nine.” Science > AI/crypto @knibbs.bsky.social @molly.wiki ww…” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 2 sources clustered

““More than 80% of congressional candidates backed by the pro-science PAC 314 Action won.” Meanwhile, “Of the twelve competitive races called so far, the side backed by crypto & AI super PACs lost nine.” Science > AI/crypto @knibbs.bsky.social @molly.wiki ww…”

“Crypto and AI super PACs spent $250 million on the midterms. In competitive races, their candidates got clobbered: nine losses out of 12 called so far, including Ohio, where crypto spent $64 million and still couldn’t beat Sherrod Brown. www.citationneeded.…”

Established AI field signal Resource 6d ago
⚡ 215 h early
America.gov US government resource

America.gov

25 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Vincent Conitzer, Andrea Lathrop
“America.gov does not do pronouns. Any pronouns. (Courtesy of my daughter!) aifails.substack.com/p/pronouns” evidence ↗
25 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“America.gov does not do pronouns. Any pronouns. (Courtesy of my daughter!) aifails.substack.com/p/pronouns”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Jessica Ji weighed in on the new #AI-powered https://t.co/sEHIhq7mvb website for @USATODAY, saying that it can be a useful resource for people trying to navigate U.S. government websites. She also notes its risks: “When this kind of AI system is empowered t…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“The chatbot comes as an expansion of the Office of Personnel Management’s work to modernize access to public federal workforce data. Integration with America.gov is planned. www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SUx... Read more by @madialder.bsky.social: fedscoop.com/o…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Julian Sanchez: Ok wow. This is both extensive and deeply surreal. Tell America.gov to Play Minecraft.
Julian Sanchez: Amusingly, the chatbot appears to be unable to recognize that it said anything weird. It “thinks” it just responded that it can’t play minecraft.
Justin Hendrix: Weird
Open the full discussion →