Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Policy & governance Building & implementation Research & technical analysis
3 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Dario Amodei — We Must Pace the Frontier Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions Multiple readings A Severe Misalignment of AI in Mathematics Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions Multiple readings Ai silicon valley Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by rat king 🐀 👑 ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 10h ago
⚡ 2 h early

Dario Amodei — We Must Pace the Frontier

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Jane Rosenzweig
“If I were teaching this course now, I'd give this to my students read it closely with them, not just for what it says about risk but about human agency, for how it lays out responsibility, and for what claims and assumptions it makes without evidence. dario…” evidence ↗
11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Ben Recht Ethan Mollick Tim Kellogg Kate Klonick rat king 🐀 👑 Chrissy Farr Kevin A. Bryan Jon Keegan +3
2 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Tim Kellogg: Dario is back with another essay, urging a slowdown he insists AI development would still feel fast, just not recursively self-improving darioamodei.com/post/we-must...
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: Dario is back with another essay, urging a slowdown he insists AI development would still feel fast, just not recursively self-improving darioamodei.com/post/we-must...
Dustin Moskovitz: knight ajeya you cowards
Open the full discussion →
Primary source darioamodei.com ↗
New Safety & security Analysis 11h ago
Tao AI math misalignment essay

A Severe Misalignment of AI in Mathematics

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Robin Hanson
“If rewarding AI mathematicians by the same metric that we have rewarded humans ones make math go badly, then we are probably rewarding the human ones badly. With good reward metrics, we shouldn't care who wins them. https://t.co/CO6Z9o3mcW” evidence ↗
11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Melanie Mitchell Nathan Lambert Eugene Vinitsky Meredith Broussard Justin Hendrix rat king 🐀 👑 Robin Hanson Dare Obasanjo +3
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“"...the push by AI companies to solve mathematical problems as a benchmark is detrimental to the science of mathematics, and to the mathematical community."”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“If rewarding AI mathematicians by the same metric that we have rewarded humans ones make math go badly, then we are probably rewarding the human ones badly. With good reward metrics, we shouldn't care who wins them. https://t.co/CO6Z9o3mcW”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Nathan Lambert: A great read. I have similar feelings about how AI labs approach progress directly and without nurturing of scientific communities & intuition. The math research community went through the transiti…
Melanie Mitchell: A great read. I have similar feelings about how AI labs approach progress directly and without nurturing of scientific communities & intuition. The math research community went through the transiti…
Jonathan Stray: There are concerns in here I share but I can’t endorse this. This satirical response kinda sums it up “A Severe Misalignment of AI and Cancer Biology” x.com/mbeisen/stat...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source terrytao.wordpress.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 5d ago
⚡ 84 h early

Ai silicon valley

9 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · rat king 🐀 👑 , Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis
“well written, well argued presentation of real world harms of AI without going into histrionics it won’t get the same amount of pickup bc it’s not scifi coded, but it’s just as concerned https://t.co/ko6nLkYr3L https://t.co/JgaVpDrbaO” evidence ↗
9 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Boaz Barak Eryk Salvaggio rat king 🐀 👑 Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Bill Gurley Woodrow Hartzog Frank Pasquale Adam Becker +1
2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Eryk Salvaggio: This is a good succinct summary of the intelligence-as-ideology effects I’ve also been talking about lately (Gift Link): www.nytimes.com/2026/09/05/o...
tweety fish: This is a good succinct summary of the intelligence-as-ideology effects I’ve also been talking about lately (Gift Link): www.nytimes.com/2026/09/05/o...
tweety fish: the amount of begging the question that has infected the discourse top to bottom when new models come out is uh well it's not my favorite
Open the full discussion →
Primary source nytimes.com ↗