Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Mark J. Nelson ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established Culture, work & education Development 7d ago
AP automated earnings stories expand

Automated earnings stories multiply | The Associated Press

4 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“It's sort of funny that since this announcement has no date on it, you could imagine it being part of recent discourse. AP admits they're using AI to churn out 3000 slop financial articles per quarter! But it's from 2014.”

4 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Dan Greene : I gotta finish this article then write a little epilogue to SPAM about slop
John Herrman: this sounds like me when I try to talk about still working in journalism (functional digital text has been effectively free for as long as I've had a job)
Mark J. Nelson: It's sort of funny that since this announcement has no date on it, you could imagine it being part of recent discourse. AP admits they're using AI to churn out 3000 slop financial articles per quar…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

7 experts · 12 posts · 15d ago
Naomi Saphra: Are students embarrassed by AI cheating? Like, there has always been rare but unstigmatized dishonesty (memorizing a frat’s archive of finals questions) and common but stigmatized (saying you’ve st…
Naomi Saphra: I don’t know exactly what dictates cheating stigma. Ease of observation? Is there something about effort, or the margin of work required to do it honestly? Regardless, AI cheating is way too easy a…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 11 posts · 18d ago
Ted Underwood: Fascinating op-ed. Starts with the premise that models can’t check their work, then runs into the reality that in 2026, everyone knows this is wrong. Patch: a tiny exception is in “formal or verifi…
Ted Underwood: Actually sympathetic to Tufekci’s conclusion that we shouldn’t expect jobpocalypse, but people have got to stop grounding that belief in the premise that we have some mysterious power only achievab…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 9 posts · 14d ago
brennan: having a lot of conversations lately with various friends where AI people are complaining about their non-AI coworkers who are doing things slower and worse than could be done e.g. 20 minute tasks …
Mark J. Nelson: I have a friend in a totally normal office job like this, increasingly annoyed that people are doing repetitive tasks in Excel completely manually & missing a row, manually typing in data from rece…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 6d ago
Ted Underwood: What I wonder about, increasingly, is the US research funding landscape in 2029 — after we've cleaned house politically, and (likely) with China's lead on AI creating a full-blown sputnik panic in …
Ted Underwood: I'm a little pessimistic that the sputnik panic will lead to money for basic science outside AI, let alone the humanities. But we can dream!
Open the thread →