Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Meredith Martin ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Analysis 6d ago
⚡ 345 h early
Leiden Declaration AI and mathematics

Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics

14 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

14 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered

“Do read the whole thing, think about your personal and professional values, and how they can serve as strong grounds for resistance and refusal. leidendeclaration.ai”

“Weeks ago, @chanda.blacksky.app sent me this declaration, written and signed by a bunch of mathematicians. But I only had time to read it yesterday, which ended up being right on time given a new round of hype falling exactly under the patterns this documen…”

Established AI field signal Analysis 11d ago
⚡ 97 h early
McSweeney's AI economics satire

AI Economics for Dummies

14 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

14 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered

“Blood Sacrifice Fridays… lol -mcsweenys on AI finance www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/ai-...”

“McSweeney's on "AI finances" goes harder than most business publications. https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/ai-economics-for-dummies”

Established AI research Resource 12d ago
⚡ 31 h early
In the Weights newsletter issue

IN THE WEIGHTS

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“are you in the weights? Hilarious and fascinating including the mess ups intheweights.com”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“LLMs never fail to simultaneously impress and disappoint. Two searches for my name at intheweights.com showing completely different results with one accurate and one containing hallucinations.”

4 experts discussed this · 6 posts
austin: fun? I am in there. intheweights.com
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: Well, my strategy of having an incredibly common wallet name is still rendering me invisible to information systems.
austin: weirdly enough my github handle actually had a better score than my wallet name
Open the full discussion →
Developing AI field signal Signal 2d ago
⚡ 57 h early

An opinionated guide to which ai b22

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“I've already had to update the guide to which AI models to use that I wrote on Thursday to include Opus 5 and Codex's voice mode, both of which are significant & launched on Friday. Keeping up is challenging, even if you are following this stuff closely. ww…”

“An opinionated guide to which AI to use to do stuff - Ethan Mollick www.oneusefulthing.org/p/an-opinionat… #AI #guides #Claude #ChatGPT”

Established Models & releases Research 15d ago
⚡ 6 h early
proprietary LLMs impede science reproducibility

Proprietary LLMs impede scientific transparency and reproducibility - Nature Reviews Psychology

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“yeah; I've started to use the phrase "panicked gold rush" and I see this everywhere www.nature.com/articles/s44...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 7 posts · 14h ago
Reaction converging Policy & governance · 3
Ted Underwood: On reflection I’m not sure I respect the candor either, because, does Amodei have any expectation this will persuade ppl in tech? Surely not. Perhaps the actual audience for this is policy makers i…
Shubhendu Trivedi: Over time I have come to the conclusion that a lot of this isn't as much about regulatory capture and becoming a designated economic tollbooth (although there's that too). It's more like they reall…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 9 posts · 4d ago
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Ted Underwood: The constant distraction of new model releases is, I am starting to think, a good reason to be anti-AI. Imagine if they had announced a new model of steam engine every week in the 1840s. Cornelius …
Ted Underwood: every few months, I could live with
Open the thread →