Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Maxim Raginsky ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Analysis 19d ago
⚡ 7 h early
AI development pace essay

In AI, Nothing Ever Happens. Wait, It’s Happening!

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“One can always count on @jwherrman.bsky.social to make good sense of what’s happening in and around AI:”

“The AI industry is prone to massive, frequent, and intensifying narrative mood swings. Part of this is typical of a boom. But I think it's also intrinsic to the tech itself nymag.com/intelligence...”

3 experts discussed this · 9 posts
John Herrman: The AI industry is prone to massive, frequent, and intensifying narrative mood swings. Part of this is typical of a boom. But I think it's also intrinsic to the tech itself nymag.com/intelligence...
John Herrman: The constant, direct experience of enchantment, disenchantment, and re-enchantment with AI — including at the highest levels of the industry — helps explain a lot about the last few years, and what…
John Herrman: this is basically unhelpful as a whole (of course you/we want to maintain control over perceptions of tech). but for certain actors, in particular positions, being maximally open to technological e…
Open the full discussion →