Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Oliver Lemon ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 17d ago

theatlantic.com

10 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

10 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Suresh Venkatasubramanian: I know it's a trend to quit big tech and write a warning note. But this one from David Robinson is worth reading if only because he is much more careful in where he locates the concerns (about cult…
Gina Helfrich: It was going so well, until the final paragraph.
angela zhou: I know it's a trend to quit big tech and write a warning note. But this one from David Robinson is worth reading if only because he is much more careful in where he locates the concerns (about cult…
Open the full discussion →
New AI field signal Resource 19h ago
ELLIS UnConference AI research event

ELLIS UnConference

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“ELLIS UnConference 2026 - 𝗔𝗜 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘁𝘆: Featuring sessions on Entrepreneurship in AI, AI for Health, and Socetial Aspects of AI. 🔎 Sessions: https://bit.ly/4dr7xUb ❗ Register: https://bit.ly/3TOh2WU 📅 8 Dec in Paris, the day before @neuripseurope.bsky.social”

Established Safety & security Research 19d ago
⚡ 2725 h early
AI safety scaffolding evaluation paper

Safety Under Scaffolding: How Evaluation Conditions Shape Measured Safety

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Research shows AI model safety scores vary by eval format—5-20% swings occur between multiple choice and open-ended questions. Moreover, scaffolding like map-reduce can reduce measured safety, stressing the need for nuanced testing frameworks in AI deployme…”