Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings philpapers.org Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Larry Hunter ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 11d ago

philpapers.org

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Matthew Sheffield
“While many American AI researchers make claims that large language models might be sentient enough to be moral patients, Google's DeepMind lab is a lot more realistic in this regard. Senior staff scientist Alexander Lerchner has emphatically denied that dis…” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Larry Hunter Matthew Sheffield
Primary source philpapers.org ↗