Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Pwnallthethings ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 46 posts · 7d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 2 Markets & investment · 1
Pwnallthethings: This is going to be a big deal, but easy to get the wrong end of the stick on it. So I think it's worth breaking down what actually happened, why, and what it actually means, based on the public in…
Pwnallthethings: Upfront tl;dr: a model at OAI hacked out of a constrained environment inside OAI and hacked a *different* company autonomously, without authorization from any human in order to creatively solve a t…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 24 posts · 6h ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
SE Gyges: here's who signed both the Pacing the Frontier letter released today and the Pause AI letter in 2023 demanding an end to all research for six months also, raw counts for "signed today's letter" and…
SE Gyges: fundamentally this is an anthropic thing that managed to recruit some people from other companies
Open the thread →
4 experts · 23 posts · 12d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: Do they take suggestions for more? I wonder how crazy we could get it. "If someone who has an AI profile pic follows you on social media, you are prohibited from using Zig." "If you know what Huggi…
Pwnallthethings: "No LLMs for finding bugs" is the point where I think their users should flee elsewhere
Open the thread →
3 experts · 21 posts · 14d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ryan Moulton: They are sampled token by token though. I can imagine the "modal token but low probability phrase" bias affecting this.
Pwnallthethings: AIUI, LLMs are not doing linear prediction as a direct markov model. The multiple layers are reducing input sequences of words into (for lack of a non-antropomorphized term) "concepts". The next to…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 13 posts · 3d ago
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
Pwnallthethings: agree on the former, disagree on the latter tho.
Pwnallthethings: would be a pointless eval run if it were prompted with anything other than the bare eval text itself, which given that it is ExploitGym is about turning vulns into exploits, not about targeting inf…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 5d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Julian Sanchez: My worry is you hit a cultural inflection point where kids who would never previously have even considered cheating, who DO care about education, look at how ubiquitous AI cheating is & decide they…
Jed Brown: This is currently among the most-cited reasons for LLM use by university students. And a big part of it is that instructors reward the cheating, and it feels pointless when students are routinely f…
Open the thread →