Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Culture, work & education Analysis 1d ago
⚡ 28 h early
AI education flawed meta-analysis critique

Presumed Effective: The Manufacturing of an Evidence Base for AI-in-Ed Through Flawed Meta-Analysis

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Of interest from Justin Reich today: a panel discussion on "faulty meta-analyses related to AI in Education":”

“I would love everyone in education, regardless of level, to watch this discussion of the grave methodological problems of meta analysis papers on "AI in education." We are years from even a potentially valid analysis. Anyone claiming to know something now i…”